Text

Just how destructive does a culinary preference have to be before we decide to eat something else?
If contributing to the suffering of billions of animals that live miserable lives and (quite often) die in horrific ways isn’t motivating, what would be?
If being the number one contributor to the most serious thread facing the planet (global warming) isn’t enough, what is?
If increased rate of cancer, heart disease, diabetes and other ills doesn’t scare you, then what does?
And if you are tempted to put off these questions of conscience, to say, not now, then when?

And why is taste, the crudest of our senses, exempted from the ethical rules that govern our other senses? If you stop and think about it, it’s crazy. How would you judge an artist who mutilated animals in a gallery because it was visually interesting? How beautiful would the sound of a tortured animal need to be to make you want to hear it that badly? Try to imagine any end other than taste for which it would be justifiable to do what we do to animals.

Read More

Text

It’s really great that we live in a society where we have freedom of choices. Religious, jobs, marriage, sexuality, etc. And we deem other societies as inferior when they take away the freedom of those choices from their people.

What we forget however is that we too have certain restrictions. We don’t have the freedom to murder, rape, enslave, throw garbage in a river, cut down a tree down our street, etc. But we don’t consider those to be restrictions to our freedom because we generally agree that those things are wrong.

However, we have certain freedoms that should never be made into choices. Some are the faults of corporations and the government, others of the people for continuing to make choices that go against their own beliefs.

Why should we have the choice to buy an item made by slave workers outside our borders? Society as a whole doesn’t agree with that.

Why should we have the choose between buying a renewable energy car or one that runs on petrol? Society as a whole understands the impact of petrol usage and benefits of renewable energy.

Why have the choice of paper or plastic bags when plastic causes so much damage to the environment? Society as a whole understands at least that “it’s bad”.

Why should we have the choice to poison ourselves with cigarettes and alcohol? Shouldn’t at least be a maximum allowed consumption of these substances? Society as a whole understands that drug abuse impacts families, the economy, our health system, etc.

And why have the choice to eat animals who suffered a horrible life and death, support an industry that has cut down 80% of the world’s forests, emits more CO2 than any other industry including all transports combined, destroys the eco-system of the ocean by stripping it of its natural balance, and increases your risk of having cancer by 70%, not to mention cholesterol, diabetes, heart disease, etc - when we have the choice to eat plants that are more nutritious and less harmful to the planet? Once again, society as a whole would agree that all of the above are undesirable things that shouldn’t happen.

So why be given those choices at all? Should society take responsibility for their own actions and make the best choices, or should science, studies, and statistics dictate the choices for them?

Worse than having to make certain choices, is when you have no choice other than support actions that destroy the planet. Through my taxes I am funding a war, I’m subsidizing the meat industry, animal testing, the tobacco industry, the oil industry and others. Am I truly free? I sometimes have the freedom to destroy the planet I live in but not always the freedom to choose not to destroy it.

Our greed, our search for convenience and the difficulty we have to change our habits will eventually destroy us.

We all keep on passing the buck. We may say, I’ll recycle tomorrow, I’ll stop smoking next month, I’ll become vegan in a few years, I’ll cycle to work next year… and we keep doing it forever with no care for our planet and future generations, your own offspring.

We like to think that we are in control of ourselves, that we are individuals, but we make most of our choices based on what those around you deem appropriate or not.

We need to take responsibility, we need to each think before we act, we need to boycott the industries that go against our principles even if it inconveniences our lives.

That’s the only way that things change - when society is ready to admit that what they were doing up to that point was no longer needed nor morally correct (slavery, rape, women rights, racism, etc)

The time to change is now. The time to stop supporting these industries is now. The time to rescue the world is now, there’s no later - there’s no passing the buck - later is too late and you have to start it yourself.

Text

I wanted to create an alphabetical list of actions that cause pleasure or benefit to one party and suffering to the other. Some of these are looked down and illegal in our society, but some are still perfectly legal. But they all cause unnecessary suffering to somebody so I believe those should be reconsidered.

  • Animal testing
  • Bullfighting
  • Child molestation
  • Circuses with animals (including aquatic animals)
  • Dairy and eggs (in most cases)
  • Eating meat
  • Hunting / fishing
  • Kidnapping
  • Buying leather / fur
  • Murder / serial killing (depending on the killer and reason) 
  • Pesticides / “pest” control
  • Racial cleansing
  • Rape
  • Slavery / low paid workers
  • Theft
  • Torture
  • Zoos (in some cases)

cleveridiot:

At least their heart was in the right place!

cleveridiot:

At least their heart was in the right place!

Source: cleveridiot

Egg Recall Expands To More Than Half A Billion Nationwide

More than a half-billion eggs have been recalled in the nationwide investigation of a salmonella outbreak that Friday expanded to include a second Iowa farm. The outbreak has already sickened more…

The man who lives without money

Mark Boyle gave up using cash over a year ago and loves his new lifestyle. Here’s how he does it.

We Must Save the Planet By Eating Bugs

Gross. Forget it. Van Huis proposes a two-phase plan: first just farming insects to feed to more conventional livestock; and then gradually introducing them directly to the menu for humans. “We’re…

Raw Veganism Has Ex-POW Live Till 90 Without a Doctor (Pics)

In Armenia, vegetarians are few and far between in this post-Soviet nation in the South Caucasus, with its traditional, meat-based diet. So what is one to make of a 90-year-old Armenian raw vegan?

Can you Ask a Pig if his Glass is Half Full?

Experts in the UK have shown for the first time that a pig’s mood mirrors how content he is, highlighting that pigs are capable of complex emotions which are directly influenced by their living…

Text

Most non-vegans think of vegans as a group of people who all share the same views. Many think that we are crazy, although that’s beside my point.

What they don’t realise is that within the vegan community there is a huge amount of disagreement and arguments. Although most everyone agrees that animals deserve equal respect, there is a lot more to it.

Some are abolitionists and think animals should be left alone completely and never come under our power. Those would disagree with having pets, horses, etc. We live our lives, they live theirs.

Others are utilitarians and believe that if the good outweighs the bad then it’s ok. They believe that if animals were treated with respect inside of egg and dairy farms then it would be ok to consume their products. Those may even be in favor of animal testing as well depending on the benefits it brings to society as a whole.

And there are many variations within those 2 extremes of people. And there are many other types of people too. It gets very complex!

The problem is that these groups often spend half their time debating each other’s views and forget that ultimately they have something very important in common; they all share respect for animals, and they all would prefer to live in a world with less suffering.

They discuss all these possible future scenarios if we move way way or another, as though we’re playing chess.

Who cares what may happen in a utopian future situation? Who cares about consequences to a reality that’s so far away? The focus right now should simply be to teach people to respect non-humans like they respect each other. After we achieve that amazing feat, then let’s start thinking where we go from there. Whether we’re allowed to keep chickens for eggs or not, whether we’re allowed to intervene with nature, whether we should save the old lady or the puppy from a house fire - none of that matters right now, and it’s a complete waste of time to discuss it!

So please, for the sake of the animals, stop trying to prove each other wrong. Spend more time educating non-vegans and less time debating vegans who are already doing their part!